[Bug middle-end/110495] fre introduces signed wrap for vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110495 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/110495] fre introduces signed wrap for vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110495 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f703d2fd3f03890a180e8cc04df087c208999e81 commit r14-2282-gf703d2fd3f03890a180e8cc04df087c208999e81 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug middle-end/110495] fre introduces signed wrap for vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110495 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/110495] fre introduces signed wrap for vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110495 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- OK, that's a reasonable stance give we have VL vectors. I'll note that previously build_vector looked like the following, so TREE_OVERFLOW was set according to the encoded elements. Now that's no longer t

[Bug middle-end/110495] fre introduces signed wrap for vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110495 --- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- The point of the builder is that, if you know the pattern, you don't need to supply every element value to the builder. (And indeed you can't when the vector is variable length.) So something

[Bug middle-end/110495] fre introduces signed wrap for vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110495 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,