https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106314
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #4)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> > GC only supports POD-like data structures, esp. proper inheritance is not
> > supported so supporting virtual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106314
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> GC only supports POD-like data structures, esp. proper inheritance is not
> supported so supporting virtual functions looks useless.
Hmmm, in that case I'll r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106314
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106314
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
The upcoming floating point ranges (frange) are small enough (one or two words)
that I thought we could get away with streaming them as is to GC for global
ranges (SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO).
We have a mechanism
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106314
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Why do you need these structures to be in GC memory anyways?
