https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103439
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103439
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> so quite hard if not impossible to "fix" in genemit
The most complex one I saw in action was mod3 in aarch64.md:
(define_expand "mod3"
[(match_operand:GPI 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103439
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #2)
> > On Fri, 26 Nov 2021, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> >
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103439
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #2)
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2021, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103439
> >
> > --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103439
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103439
>
> --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #0)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103439
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #0)
> I'm not sure if there are valid cases where we have a mix of a direct
> RTL pattern and manual expansion, so where the { } part falls thru.
Yes, we have quite so
