https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6fade5a6044b7102758f4ca66c8715ebc12a6306
commit r11-4279-g6fade5a6044b7102758f4ca66c8715ebc12a6306
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Tom Stellard from comment #6)
> If I have make installed on my system, but am using something else (e.g.
> ninja) to build my project, will I still get parallel execution?
No, we construct an art
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
--- Comment #6 from Tom Stellard ---
If I have make installed on my system, but am using something else (e.g. ninja)
to build my project, will I still get parallel execution?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
> It could, maybe with some diagnostic. It could also use fork-based
> parallelism.
It seems to me extra work.
Expecting make for parallel execution seems to be a reasonable request.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Well, can't it fall back to serial compilation?
It could, maybe with some diagnostic. It could also use fork-based
parallelism.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97524
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-22
Ever confirmed|0
