https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70345
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70345
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 84934 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70345
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Дилян Палаузов from comment #3)
> Am I correct if I say, that the gcc plugin is backward compatible: the
> plugin from the newest gcc can be used with any gcc but not vice versa?
Right now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70345
--- Comment #3 from Дилян Палаузов ---
Am I correct if I say, that the gcc plugin is backward compatible: the plugin
from the newest gcc can be used with any gcc but not vice versa?
How do nm and ar determine, if a plugin shall be used, for inst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70345
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70345
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Andrew P
