[Bug lto/69119] More fun with LTO on arm

2016-01-13 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69119 --- Comment #9 from PeteVine --- Never mind the last one! :) It seems gcc's LTO wasn't to blame after all.

[Bug lto/69119] More fun with LTO on arm

2016-01-04 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69119 --- Comment #8 from PeteVine --- There's going to be question #3 now that I've successfully built rustc on arm using -flto. The rust compiler passes all tests but an example binary (bfc) segfaults: (gdb) bt #0 0x7f642784 in thread_rng::h22bece

[Bug lto/69119] More fun with LTO on arm

2016-01-04 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69119 --- Comment #7 from PeteVine --- That's what normally do; I simply wasn't sure if these were gcc bugs or not. I take it the jemalloc one can be closed on github then?

[Bug lto/69119] More fun with LTO on arm

2016-01-04 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69119 --- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to PeteVine from comment #5) > Wait, what about #1? Sorry, I hadn't spotted that there were two issues in the one report. Please create separate bug reports for each issue - it's much easier to

[Bug lto/69119] More fun with LTO on arm

2016-01-04 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69119 --- Comment #5 from PeteVine --- Wait, what about #1?

[Bug lto/69119] More fun with LTO on arm

2016-01-04 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69119 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/69119] More fun with LTO on arm

2016-01-03 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69119 --- Comment #3 from PeteVine --- You were right about #2 - I passed LDFLAGS=-fPIC to both configure and later make which solved the issue somewhere. Thanks a lot!

[Bug lto/69119] More fun with LTO on arm

2016-01-03 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69119 --- Comment #2 from PeteVine --- Unfortunately I don't a have working 5.x at my disposal on arm. I'll remember about this issue when it becomes available. Anyway on 4.9, the suggestion is to recompile something with -fPIC but it's not clear what

[Bug lto/69119] More fun with LTO on arm

2016-01-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69119 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/69119] More fun with LTO on arm

2016-01-02 Thread tulipawn at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69119 PeteVine changed: What|Removed |Added Target||armv7 Host|