https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
This bug seems to have been present since some revision before 260047.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 44219
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44219&action=edit
x86_64 object module
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to jenda.plhak from comment #2)
> Yes. That was the first thing I did. However we use Tup, but I don't really
> think it is relevant.(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1)
> > Have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #2 from jenda.plhak at gmail dot com ---
Yes. That was the first thing I did. However we use Tup, but I don't really
think it is relevant.(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1)
> Have you rebuild all the object files with 5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
