https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
--- Comment #19 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #18)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #17)
> > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #16)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15)
> > > > (In repl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
--- Comment #18 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #17)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #16)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15)
> > > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #14)
> > > > W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #16)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #14)
> > > Well, at least your patch survives a Firefox LTO build using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
--- Comment #16 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #14)
> > Well, at least your patch survives a Firefox LTO build using gold
> > on a ppc64 test machine.
>
> Does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #14)
> Well, at least your patch survives a Firefox LTO build using gold
> on a ppc64 test machine.
Does it build without my patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
--- Comment #14 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Well, at least your patch survives a Firefox LTO build using gold
on a ppc64 test machine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34725|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In repl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 34725
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34725&action=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Feb 6 13:55:42 2015
New Revision: 220477
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220477&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert the PR lto/64837 fix
It breaks gold:
% echo "int main () {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jan 28 19:39:42 2015
New Revision: 220212
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220212&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Call release_input_file in claim_file_handler
PR lto/64837
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02508.html
17 matches
Mail list logo
