[Bug lto/63998] gcc.dg/lto/pr60820 fails on darwin

2014-11-21 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63998 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug lto/63998] gcc.dg/lto/pr60820 fails on darwin

2014-11-21 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63998 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug lto/63998] gcc.dg/lto/pr60820 fails on darwin

2014-11-21 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63998 --- Comment #6 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Fri Nov 21 08:38:41 2014 New Revision: 217907 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217907&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/63998 * gcc.dg/lto/pr60820_0.c: Skip on darwi

[Bug lto/63998] gcc.dg/lto/pr60820 fails on darwin

2014-11-21 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63998 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63998 > > --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > If so, it would probably need > >

[Bug lto/63998] gcc.dg/lto/pr60820 fails on darwin

2014-11-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63998 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > If so, it would probably need > > // { dg-additional-options "-Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup" { target > *-*-darwin* } } > // { dg-additional-options "-Wl,-flat_namespace" { target *-*-darwin[89]* }

[Bug lto/63998] gcc.dg/lto/pr60820 fails on darwin

2014-11-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63998 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug lto/63998] gcc.dg/lto/pr60820 fails on darwin

2014-11-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63998 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Maybe the testcase misses { dg-require-weak "" }? Not sure if that works for lto.exp though - can you check?

[Bug lto/63998] gcc.dg/lto/pr60820 fails on darwin

2014-11-20 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63998 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin14 |x86_64-apple-darwin1*

[Bug lto/63998] gcc.dg/lto/pr60820 fails on darwin

2014-11-20 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63998 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-apple-darwin14