http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3)
> > BTW it is interesting that gcc compiles the attached testcase faster
> > when using LTO.
> >
> > % ti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #3)
> BTW it is interesting that gcc compiles the attached testcase faster
> when using LTO.
>
> % time g++ -flto=4 -Wfatal-errors -fPIC -shared -fno-rtti -O3 Ba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
BTW it is interesting that gcc compiles the attached testcase faster
when using LTO.
% time g++ -flto=4 -Wfatal-errors -fPIC -shared -fno-rtti -O3 BasicBlock.ii
Function.ii
52.48s user 0.59s system 168
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
markus@x4 llvm_build % cat BasicBlock.ii
struct A {};
namespace llvm {
struct B {};
template struct ilist_traits : B {};
template class ilist_iterator : A {
public:
ilist_iterator(int) {}
int opera
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 31417
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31417&action=edit
testcase
