http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #26 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-25
20:28:13 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri May 25 20:28:10 2012
New Revision: 187893
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187893
Log:
PR lto/52178
* tree-inline.c (remap_gi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #25 from Eric Botcazou 2012-05-25
20:26:20 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri May 25 20:26:11 2012
New Revision: 187892
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187892
Log:
PR lto/52178
* tree-inline.c (remap_gi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #23 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-15
00:10:06 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Feb 15 00:10:00 2012
New Revision: 184246
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184246
Log:
PR lto/52178
* gimple.c (iterative_has
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #22 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-14
08:39:59 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 14 08:39:55 2012
New Revision: 184200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184200
Log:
2012-02-14 Richard Guenther
PR lto/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13
17:06:44 UTC ---
> Yeah. I'm now getting further with Ada LTO bootstrap, but hit an ICE
> during optimization:
>
> /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/ada/sem_prag.adb: In function
> 'sem_prag__analy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #20 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-13
14:43:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> > Which should avoid the issue. But I suppose that variably_modified_type_p
> > wrongly checks
> >
> > if (TREE_CODE (type) == QUAL_UNION_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13
14:21:57 UTC ---
> Which should avoid the issue. But I suppose that variably_modified_type_p
> wrongly checks
>
> if (TREE_CODE (type) == QUAL_UNION_TYPE)
> RETURN_TRUE_IF_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-02-13 14:18:58 UTC ---
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
>
> Eric Botcazou changed:
>
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-02-13 14:13:39 UTC ---
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
> >
> > -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-02-13 14:03:27 UTC ---
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
>
> --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13
> 13:55:4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13
13:55:47 UTC ---
> Or, alternatively - should DECL_QUALIFIER matter at all after gimplification?
No, it shouldn't.
> Can we simply not stream it (thus, have a NULL_TREE DECL_QUALIFIER in WPA
> and L
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13
13:54:31 UTC ---
> Should PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs even survive gimplification? I see tree.c says
> if they survive until expand we'll ICE - but that comment is probably from
> before gimple/SSA times.
Yes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13
13:53:01 UTC ---
> Still they are refered to globally. I'm refering to
> atree__atree_private_part__node_record___is_extension___XVN
> (it doesn't have any TYPE_CONTEXT though, and its TYPE_SIZE is a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-13
13:44:44 UTC ---
Or, alternatively - should DECL_QUALIFIER matter at all after gimplification?
Can we simply not stream it (thus, have a NULL_TREE DECL_QUALIFIER in WPA
and LTRANS stage)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-13
13:42:49 UTC ---
Should PLACEHOLDER_EXPRs even survive gimplification? I see tree.c says
if they survive until expand we'll ICE - but that comment is probably from
before gimple/SSA times.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-13
13:29:38 UTC ---
Ok, the issue is that we end up with using a type streamed into the function
sections - those are assumed to not need participating in merging and thus
we never merge them, even can
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13
12:39:06 UTC ---
> I see. I came up with the following, but it's unlikely to make a
> difference either
Thanks, I'll give it a try. While Ada doesn't use METHOD_TYPE, it extensively
uses type attrib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-02-13 12:29:36 UTC ---
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
>
> --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13
> 12:17:46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13
12:17:46 UTC ---
> Sth I'm not very familiar is the QUAL_UNION record kinds - maybe you
> can eye the two merging machineries for obvious errors here?
I did, and only came up with the following no-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-02-13 11:57:43 UTC ---
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
>
> --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13
> 11:53:38
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-13
11:53:38 UTC ---
> Merging happens at WPA time, it happens again at LTRANS but that is an
> implementation artifact (it should not be necessary to merge again).
OK.
> Ok, this sounds like it is a rea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-10
17:51:19 UTC ---
> I don't understand this sentence completely - if the types have been merged
> then the COMPONENT_REFs should have been updated, too (do they only have
> "weak" matched types at the p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52178
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guen
26 matches
Mail list logo
