http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
--- Comment #15 from Peter Bergner 2012-04-23
16:40:10 UTC ---
Author: bergner
Date: Mon Apr 23 16:39:59 2012
New Revision: 186714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186714
Log:
Merge up to 186704 (pick up PR lto/48246).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
--- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner 2012-04-23
12:44:51 UTC ---
Author: bergner
Date: Mon Apr 23 12:44:46 2012
New Revision: 186703
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186703
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-06-11 Jan H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-18
10:53:08 UTC ---
The problem should be fixed on mainline now. Concerning comment #8, the problem
is that LTO files needs to be rebuild after every compiler update. Official
release will bump up LTO fil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-18
10:51:45 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Jun 18 10:51:43 2011
New Revision: 175175
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175175
Log:
oops, comitted with wrong PR# :(
PR lto/48246
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||petr.malik at hotmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
--- Comment #8 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-04-04 13:22:26 UTC ---
I downloaded and installed
gcc version 4.6.1 20110401
as I issued a "make" in the same area where I had the ICE in
lto_wpa_write_files
I got
lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincenzo.innocente at cern
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
--- Comment #6 from Richa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-31
10:02:03 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 31 10:02:00 2011
New Revision: 171775
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171775
Log:
2011-03-31 Richard Guenther
PR lto/482
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-31
10:00:48 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 31 10:00:44 2011
New Revision: 171774
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171774
Log:
2011-03-31 Richard Guenther
PR lto/482
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
Bastiaan Jacques changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bastiaan at bjacques dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-03-23 13:07:58 UTC
---
> Honza, why do we even care to assert the above if we handle empty
> partitions just fine (in case of !i)? It looks like some partitioning
> sanity check to me, not something we should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
15 matches
Mail list logo