[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-08 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-08 11:14:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > I don't known where I report the following issue: > > C:\>gcc -O2 -pipe Hello.c > > C:\>a > Hello, World! > > C:\>gcc -O2 -pipe -flto Hello.c > c:/gcc-4.6-w

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-08 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #11 from Dongsheng Song 2011-02-08 11:04:32 UTC --- I don't known where I report the following issue: C:\>gcc -O2 -pipe Hello.c C:\>a Hello, World! C:\>gcc -O2 -pipe -flto Hello.c c:/gcc-4.6-windows/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-w64-mingw32/

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-08 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-08 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #9 from Dongsheng Song 2011-02-08 10:04:25 UTC --- Thanks, with the following patch (Windows.h => windows.h), the building OK now: $ git diff ld/configure.in ld/plugin.c diff --git a/ld/configure.in b/ld/configure.in index 2836545..b

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-08 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-08 09:25:38 UTC --- Is binutils build using option '--enable-plugins'? It is worth a try. AFAICS is there in ld's configure.ac a quirk about the header-check windows.h. It uses here Windows.h, which can lead

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-08 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #7 from Dongsheng Song 2011-02-08 08:56:26 UTC --- The source of binutils for native compiler same as the cross building compiler, so I think this maybe an autotools bug of binutils: oracle@vc:~/vcs/git/binutils$ git log -1 commit c4

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-08 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-08 08:03:22 UTC --- Just out of interest. What binutils version you are using? As error message indicates that the ld tool doesn't recognize -plugin command.

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-07 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #5 from Dongsheng Song 2011-02-08 06:41:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Does it help on cross-compile to do after 'make all-gcc && make install-gcc' > to > do additionally 'make install-lto-plugin'? > > The fatal error in gcc.

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-02-05 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-01-31 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #3 from Dongsheng Song 2011-02-01 07:28:37 UTC --- Confirmed, $ svn info ${GCC_SOURCE_DIR} Path: /home/oracle/vcs/svn/gcc/trunk URL: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk Repository Root: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc Repository UUID: 138bc75d

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-01-31 Thread dongsheng.song at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 --- Comment #2 from Dongsheng Song 2011-01-31 14:34:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I think you use an old GCC snapshot (if you didn't pass -fuse-linker-plugin > manually). That said, your target should not use the flag unconditionally, >

[Bug lto/47528] liblto_plugin.so not found should not to be an fatal error

2011-01-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||mingw64-*-* --- Comment #1 from Richar