--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 16:49 ---
Subject: Bug 43212
Author: rguenth
Date: Sat Jul 24 16:49:38 2010
New Revision: 162501
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162501
Log:
2010-07-24 Richard Guenther
PR lto/43212
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 16:46 ---
Hm, I can't reproduce this anymore. Thus, fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-23 16:25 ---
Honza, you might want to have a look here.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-08 11:23 ---
We do have a fixup pass for this, but somehow it doesnt' work.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43212
--- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-08 10:43 ---
Should LTO reject function declarations with incompatible attributes? Or should
the "discovery" of the attribute in one translation unit be used to update the
control flow graph in the other units (e.g. by writing out
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 10:43 ---
Confirmed. We do have sort-of a fixup pass to deal with this, but it doesn't
work very well.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
