https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105121
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022, dcb314 at hotmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105121
>
> David Binderman changed:
>
>What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105121
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105121
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #3)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > Are you sure you have object files compiled with the same compiler as you
> > link with?
>
> I just compiled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105121
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Note that we don't bump LTO bytecode version during the development of a GCC
release (stage1-4). Once we do a release, we keep eye on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105121
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Are you sure you have object files compiled with the same compiler as you
> link with?
I just compiled it again. Yes, I have the same compiler.
It looks like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105121
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-04-01
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105121
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Are you sure you have object files compiled with the same compiler as you link
with?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105121
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 52732
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52732&action=edit
x86 object module
