https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:488d268728bf701ac76a1392eaed202c80be3843
commit r13-152-g488d268728bf701ac76a1392eaed202c80be3843
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.2|13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.0|12.2
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I wonder if there's a reason we don't just put the visibility on the namespace
the way we do elsewhere:
namespace std _GLIBCXX_VISIBILITY(default)
I will do that, or just move the pragma after the include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99871
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
