https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90920
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90920
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed for 9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90920
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 21 17:37:07 2019
New Revision: 272558
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272558&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/90920 restore previous checks for empty ranges
The change i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90920
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On June 20, 2019 6:42:10 PM GMT+02:00, "redi at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90920
>
>--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
>I did experiment with putti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90920
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I did experiment with putting the range checks in *both* places, the
std::rotate function and the std::__rotate helpers it calls. But there's still
no guarantee you won't get a "bad" combination of definit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90920
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
