[Bug libstdc++/69581] [6 Regression] r232586 broke arm-cross-compiler bootstrap

2016-02-01 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69581 --- Comment #10 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9) > (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #7) > > Thanks. Now about reversing the comments at the bottom of math.h ? > > I don't understand the question. I a

[Bug libstdc++/69581] [6 Regression] r232586 broke arm-cross-compiler bootstrap

2016-02-01 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69581 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #7) > Thanks. Now about reversing the comments at the bottom of math.h ? I don't understand the question. I already fixed the order of the comments in the commit.

[Bug libstdc++/69581] [6 Regression] r232586 broke arm-cross-compiler bootstrap

2016-02-01 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69581 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/69581] [6 Regression] r232586 broke arm-cross-compiler bootstrap

2016-02-01 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69581 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger --- Thanks. Now about reversing the comments at the bottom of math.h ? Index: libstdc++-v3/include/c_compatibility/math.h === --- libstdc++-v3/in

[Bug libstdc++/69581] [6 Regression] r232586 broke arm-cross-compiler bootstrap

2016-02-01 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69581 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Feb 1 11:13:40 2016 New Revision: 233035 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233035&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Don't define guard macros when doing #include_next in math.h and stdlib.h

[Bug libstdc++/69581] [6 Regression] r232586 broke arm-cross-compiler bootstrap

2016-02-01 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69581 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/69581] [6 Regression] r232586 broke arm-cross-compiler bootstrap

2016-01-31 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69581 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger --- this fixes it for me: Index: libstdc++-v3/include/c_compatibility/math.h === --- libstdc++-v3/include/c_compatibility/math.h (revision 233023)

[Bug libstdc++/69581] [6 Regression] r232586 broke arm-cross-compiler bootstrap

2016-01-31 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69581 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I am surprised you are not using a sysroot. Hmm, I kind of stole the include/lib files from the target, and install them to the prefix tree at the right place.

[Bug libstdc++/69581] [6 Regression] r232586 broke arm-cross-compiler bootstrap

2016-01-31 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69581 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger --- Created attachment 37534 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37534&action=edit preprocessed source code

[Bug libstdc++/69581] [6 Regression] r232586 broke arm-cross-compiler bootstrap

2016-01-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69581 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target Milestone|---