[Bug libstdc++/66998] not_fn invocation is not SFINAE friendly

2015-09-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66998 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/66998] not_fn invocation is not SFINAE friendly

2015-09-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66998 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Sep 3 15:10:52 2015 New Revision: 227455 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227455&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Make std::experimental::not_fn SFINAE-friendly. PR libstdc++/669

[Bug libstdc++/66998] not_fn invocation is not SFINAE friendly

2015-09-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66998 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Sep 3 14:36:03 2015 New Revision: 227448 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227448&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Make std::experimental::not_fn SFINAE-friendly. PR libstdc++/669

[Bug libstdc++/66998] not_fn invocation is not SFINAE friendly

2015-07-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66998 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Tomasz Kamiński from comment #2) > Should I create separate issue? Oops, no we can deal with both under this PR. If I commit my invoke() implementation then we can just use that, and it will

[Bug libstdc++/66998] not_fn invocation is not SFINAE friendly

2015-07-24 Thread tomaszkam at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66998 --- Comment #2 from Tomasz Kamiński --- Sorry for missing using declaration. > It's certainly a nice QoI improvement. I was basically lazy when I > implemented it and used decltype(auto) because it's convenient. Yes, the decltype(auto) is con

[Bug libstdc++/66998] not_fn invocation is not SFINAE friendly

2015-07-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66998 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|