https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66157
--- Comment #9 from Luca Stoppa ---
I see.
Thanks again for your answer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66157
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I already said that it works fine with C++ code *you* write, in any standard
mode. But don't expect everyone else's C++ code (including standard library
headers) to follow the old pre-1998 rules.
If you us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66157
--- Comment #7 from Luca Stoppa ---
Well, even if my production code is 20 years old, the example I have attached
isn't. It is valid c++11/14 code.
Would you call something like this "old c++ code"?
#include
int main()
{
std::vector v{1,2,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66157
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66157
--- Comment #5 from Luca Stoppa ---
I think you can close this "bug".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66157
--- Comment #4 from Luca Stoppa ---
It is a very very very... old application written like 20 years ago.
Anyway, we'll try to remove that option from our build process.
Thanks for your answer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66157
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The option works exactly as documented, and can be used freely with your own
code if you need to compile old code. Obviously if you include any code you
didn't write (such as standard library headers) then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66157
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |minor
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66157
--- Comment #2 from Luca Stoppa ---
I'm sorry, what do you mean with "don't do that"?
Can you please tell me whether c++11/14 with -fno-for-scope is supported?
