https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65630
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65630
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Mar 30 17:52:37 2015
New Revision: 221775
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221775&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/65630
* config/abi/pre/gnu.ver: Export operator+ for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65630
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65630
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If we are going to export these it might make sense to add extern template
declarations, so the compiler knows the symbols will be in the library and
doesn't bother instantiating them. Otherwise the only pe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65630
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Strictly nothing says it has to, but it works with the old std::string, because
we do export those functions from libstdc++.so
We also instantiate them for the new string, I just didn't add exports for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65630
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65630
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|