[Bug libstdc++/65473] Including does not define __GLIBCXX__

2015-09-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65473 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/65473] Including does not define __GLIBCXX__

2015-09-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65473 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Sep 4 09:16:29 2015 New Revision: 227484 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227484&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Make all headers include PR libstdc++/65473 * include/

[Bug libstdc++/65473] Including does not define __GLIBCXX__

2015-04-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65473 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- But there's no such thing as a detection macro in the standard, so it's not going to talk about where they belong.

[Bug libstdc++/65473] Including does not define __GLIBCXX__

2015-04-09 Thread ldionne.2 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65473 --- Comment #4 from Louis Dionne --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > (In reply to Louis Dionne from comment #2) > > Does the standard specify which headers should define those macros? > > Of course not, __GLIBCXX__ is not specifi

[Bug libstdc++/65473] Including does not define __GLIBCXX__

2015-04-09 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65473 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Louis Dionne from comment #2) > Does the standard specify which headers should define those macros? Of course not, __GLIBCXX__ is not specified by the standard at all. > If not, > then it's

[Bug libstdc++/65473] Including does not define __GLIBCXX__

2015-03-23 Thread ldionne.2 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65473 --- Comment #2 from Louis Dionne --- Does the standard specify which headers should define those macros? If not, then it's a QOI issue that could easily be solved. In all cases, does stdcxx document which headers must be included in order to get

[Bug libstdc++/65473] Including does not define __GLIBCXX__

2015-03-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65473 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Louis Dionne from comment #0) > One would expect that including _any_ header from the standard library > defines the relevant detection macros. That's not true for most of the headers.