[Bug libstdc++/65042] gcc5 has a template depth problem that was fine in gcc4

2025-01-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65042 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/65042] gcc5 has a template depth problem that was fine in gcc4

2017-12-12 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65042 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/65042] gcc5 has a template depth problem that was fine in gcc4

2015-02-13 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65042 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Trying to use the standard library with such a tiny limit is simply not going to work. If it worked previously you got lucky, but if you need to raise the limit now then that's what you need to do. What's

[Bug libstdc++/65042] gcc5 has a template depth problem that was fine in gcc4

2015-02-12 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65042 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Yeah, the default is 900. (C++11 recommends 1024 AFAIK.) >From what I can see they used /usr/lib64/ccache/g++ -v -save-temps -g3 -O0 -DDEBUG -ftemplate-depth-25 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -pthread -Idefault/src/main

[Bug libstdc++/65042] gcc5 has a template depth problem that was fine in gcc4

2015-02-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65042 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org Compone