https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba5e10a8c84f56bb2838adb6d1cc9b74741ac4f1
commit r9-9640-gba5e10a8c84f56bb2838adb6d1cc9b74741ac4f1
Author: Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2074277aa3ce0848429e34d6149ba26ff3b708e
commit r10-9997-gf2074277aa3ce0848429e34d6149ba26ff3b708e
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c0c7fc6236470a533675cd3cd1ebb1cc3dd112c
commit r11-8198-g6c0c7fc6236470a533675cd3cd1ebb1cc3dd112c
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rafal at rawicki dot org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 4 10:54:59 2017
New Revision: 244051
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244051&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Support exception propagation without lock-free atomic int
2017-01-04
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
--- Comment #9 from Pauli ---
atomicity.h uses exactly same builtins if _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS is set 1.
Difference include check for __gthread_active_p check and annotations for race
detector. Annotations are empty macros in default build. Sam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
i.e. it's not broken, it's missing, and that's by design.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think this is expected, the std:future type and std::async function are
declared unconditionally, but the definitions are guarded by:
#if defined(_GLIBCXX_HAS_GTHREADS) && defined(_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDINT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
12 matches
Mail list logo
