https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64135
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64135
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe9571a35db53e5203326f854f73e432691d67f6
commit r12-5873-gfe9571a35db53e5203326f854f73e432691d67f6
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64135
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Another option would be to drop the base class from std::allocator when
> configured to derive from new_allocator, and just inline that code into
> std::alloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64135
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
One option would be to just rename the base class (possibly only the default
new_allocator one, as selecting a different allocator implementation is an
explicit choice, and so users can deal with the conseq
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64135
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
