https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62056
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Agustín Bergé from comment #15)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> > Agustin, do you have a copyright assignment?
>
> I do not have one. The attached is derived from libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62056
--- Comment #15 from Agustín Bergé ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> Agustin, do you have a copyright assignment?
I do not have one. The attached is derived from libstdc++'s and
I have left the license in place, wouldn't tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62056
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #11)
> Jonathan, what should we do about this? Is this implementation better than
> the one in libstdc++?
I don't know, I haven't looked.
Agustin, do you hav
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62056
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62056
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62056
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |libstdc++
--- Comment #12 from Man
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62056
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Piotr Dziwinski from comment #1)
> I would also second the proposal to fix this issue by implementing flat
> version of std::tuple. Perhaps the existing std::tr1::tuple implementation
> can be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62056
Piotr Dziwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||piotrdz at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
