https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #15)
> After discussing this on IRC I'll make a change to support this use case,
> without needing to rebuild libstdc++ when glibc is updated.
I've created https:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> So I believe the problem is that you need to reconfigure libstdc++ with the
> new glibc headers, you can't just drop them in later and expect an
> already-b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #13)
> -- snip --
> In file included from .../git/gcc/install/include/c++/6.0.0/math.h:36:0,
>from x.C:1:
> .../gcc/install/include/c++/6.0.0/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
--- Comment #13 from Dominik Vogt ---
I'm running into problems testing the latest Gcc with the latest Glibc. The
test program is just
#include
It's a bit difficult to provide the propert args to g++ to make it use the
replacement Glibc aft
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
--- Comment #12 from Dominik Vogt ---
Regarding the Glibc fix; do you mean this commit?
2016-01-11 13:34 Adhemerval Zanella * Fix isinf/isnan
declaration conflict with C++11
That does *not* fix the isnan and isinf errors.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
--- Comment #11 from Dominik Vogt ---
Looks good, the errors are gone now. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 20 17:44:58 2016
New Revision: 232627
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232627&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add C++11 overloads to the global namespace
PR libstdc++/60401
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The isnan and isinf errors need a glibc fix, which will be in glibc 2.23, the
rest I have a patch for.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
--- Comment #8 from Dominik Vogt ---
List of functions the test complains about:
acosh, asinh, atanh, cbrt, copysign, erf, erfc, exp2, expm1, fdim, fma, fmax,
fmin, hypot, ilogb, isinf, isnan, lgamma, llrint, llround, log1p, log2, logb,
lrint, l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
--- Comment #7 from Dominik Vogt ---
Created attachment 37408
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37408&action=edit
List of errors
This is a list of all remaining errors of the Plumhall test. I've not checked
whether they all d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
--- Comment #6 from Dominik Vogt ---
The fix seems to be incomplete. This program still does not compile:
-- snip --
#include
static long double (*p3c_)(long double) = acosh;
-- snip --
$ g++ -std=c++11 -S x.C
x.C:3:43: error: invalid con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jan 19 21:43:55 2016
New Revision: 232586
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232586&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add C++-conforming wrappers for stdlib.h and math.h
PR libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(dup of PR 33935)
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> If you include stdlib.h and not cstdlib it's a glibc bug, not a
> gcc/libstdc++ one.
It would make sense for libstdc++ to provide wrappers to th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
If you include stdlib.h and not cstdlib it's a glibc bug, not a gcc/libstdc++
one.
16 matches
Mail list logo
