http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56922
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-04-11
16:33:38 UTC ---
Yes, libstdc++ is already correct, there's nothing for us to do here
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56922
--- Comment #3 from Akim Demaille 2013-04-11
16:23:57 UTC ---
Agreed. Sorry for the noise, I was not aware of this page.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56922
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-04-11
16:16:07 UTC ---
I was about to reply that the issue isn't just about std::set and I was trying
to remember why we decided many years ago to *not* have the explicit in the
singled out default co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56922
--- Comment #1 from Akim Demaille 2013-04-11
16:08:07 UTC ---
FWIW: http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2193
