https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55815
--- Comment #9 from landave ---
I am on Fedora with gcc 8.1.1, and it seems this issue has not been resolved
yet.
I have attached an example for a multicollision, as well as a small program
that inserts the strings into an std::unordered_set. Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55815
landave changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blog at landave dot io
--- Comment #8 from lan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55815
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to felix-glibc from comment #5)
> I mean seriously, you argue performance for a security measure?
> Does Google turn off stack cookies in production? ACL checks?
> All this password checking is ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55815
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55815
--- Comment #5 from felix-glibc at fefe dot de ---
How about you add SipHash and make it selectable at runtime.
Then I can file security bugs against all relevant programs not
selecting it for being vulnerable and glibc has their ass covered
regar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55815
Geoff Pike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gpike at google dot com
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55815
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-01-05
14:48:22 UTC ---
Whatever we do here I suppose we should involve Matt.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55815
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-05
14:34:53 UTC ---
N.B. I think the only use of _Hash_bytes which users can't already replace is
in type_info::hash_code(), which must give a consistent result across
ABI-compatible releases.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55815
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
