http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-27
12:38:48 UTC ---
I guess we should simply implement in stdint-wrap.h and stdint-gcc.h what
Joseph recommended. It seems safer to me to conditionalize the change on C++11.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-07 16:06:46 UTC ---
My previous suggestion stands of having the compiler predefine
__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS and __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS, whether for C++11 or
generally for C++, to make all exi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-03-29
10:25:22 UTC ---
Joseph, I was just about to file a glibc bug, let me know if you want that
done.
Glibc's stdint.h (and GCC's stdint-gcc.h) must unconditionally define the
macros for C++11.
It's de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52764
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
