http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51932
nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51932
nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51932
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51932
--- Comment #2 from nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com 2012-01-21 14:10:15
UTC ---
So then std::errno shouldn't compile, according to the standard? Because,
googling "std::errno" shows me some people attempting to use std::errno.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51932
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-21
14:06:51 UTC ---
errno is required to be a macro, you can't use std::NULL either