[Bug libstdc++/51932] Cannot use std::errno with

2012-01-21 Thread nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51932 nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Re

[Bug libstdc++/51932] Cannot use std::errno with

2012-01-21 Thread nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51932 nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/51932] Cannot use std::errno with

2012-01-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51932 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/51932] Cannot use std::errno with

2012-01-21 Thread nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51932 --- Comment #2 from nospam.kotarou.dono at gmail dot com 2012-01-21 14:10:15 UTC --- So then std::errno shouldn't compile, according to the standard? Because, googling "std::errno" shows me some people attempting to use std::errno.

[Bug libstdc++/51932] Cannot use std::errno with

2012-01-21 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51932 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-21 14:06:51 UTC --- errno is required to be a macro, you can't use std::NULL either