http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51657
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-23
01:31:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Well, I am astonished at the carelessness of the LWG. If something is plainly
> wrong, it should be fixed (which would be trivial in this case) or withdra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51657
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-12-23
01:31:05 UTC ---
Yeah, it's unbelievable, you should help these poor souls.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51657
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Yeleighton
2011-12-23 00:45:28 UTC ---
Well, I am astonished at the carelessness of the LWG. If something is plainly
wrong, it should be fixed (which would be trivial in this case) or withdrawn,
not deprecated. D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51657
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-22
22:28:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Report silently ignored.
No it wasn't, see the note at the top of the post:
[Moderator's note: this defect report has been
forwarded to th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51657
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-12-22
22:00:44 UTC ---
Too bad was ignored, but really, if you are interested in my advice, you should
get in touch with somebody very active in the LWG if you want to be sure
nothing is forgotten (eg, these
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51657
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Yeleighton
2011-12-22 21:46:58 UTC ---
The standard is obviously wrong.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c++/browse_thread/thread/de856e5116876ff3/b34116c5e51b1d07?lnk=gst&q=bind1st#b34116c5e51b1d07
>
Repo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51657
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
