https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51653
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> We should do it for the --enable-symvers=gnu-versioned-namespace build.
s/should/could/
If it makes the implementation diverge too much (and requires suppor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51653
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-06
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51653
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Is there anything more to do for this?
Yes. This PR is about having the library reorder the elements of a tuple to
minimize the size, and the current code does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51653
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Is there anything more to do for this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51653
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3)
> The suggestion in this PR is quite wild, but the fact that
> sizeof(tuple)==20 is a real issue that
> could probably be solved with less trouble (still ABI-br
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51653
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51653
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2011-12-24
22:25:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I'm not yet convinced we want to apply it,
Hi,
just so I know, what part are you not convinced about?
1) that we want a library solution? it is just a proof
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51653
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-22
12:57:06 UTC ---
Neat! Thanks for demonstrating this. I'm not yet convinced we want to apply it,
but it's nice to know it can be done without *too* much trouble.
