[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-18 22:33:19 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sun Dec 18 22:33:15 2011 New Revision: 182461 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182461 Log: PR libstdc++/51540 * include/bits/stl_num

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-17 Thread giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #17 from Christopher Yeleighton 2011-12-17 17:05:58 UTC --- The SGI documentation clarifies all issues well enough indeed. I wonder whether it would be a good thing to put a reference to SGI in the documentation index (with a warning

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-17 13:26:04 UTC --- Or of course you can look at the code

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-17 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-17 13:23:11 UTC --- There are good books by Josuttis and Austern, or the SGI docs online. Our docs could definitely improved, but there are other ways to get the info you want, if you look for it

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-16 Thread giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #14 from Christopher Yeleighton 2011-12-16 20:31:24 UTC --- I would rather prefer to be able to use gcc (as a software developer) while not having the ISO standard, which is 1) unreadable with an unarmed eye, 2) not free (as in anythi

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-16 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini 2011-12-16 20:16:16 UTC --- Up to Jon to decide which details he wants to add to the docs, but please always keep in mind that in the areas where the behavior isn't implementation defined only the ISO Standard (

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-16 Thread giecrilj at stegny dot 2a.pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #12 from Christopher Yeleighton 2011-12-16 18:59:31 UTC --- Additionally, and also for the default operator form, it is unclear what the result is when the operator is noncommutative. That is, whether y[n+1] is set to x[n+1]+y[n] or

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-15 09:50:04 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Thu Dec 15 09:49:59 2011 New Revision: 182359 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182359 Log: PR libstdc++/51540 * include/bits/stl_num

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wak

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-14 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2011-12-14 11:17:44 UTC --- Thanks for the docs, Jon.

[Bug libstdc++/51540] doxygen documentation for partial_sum misleading

2011-12-14 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51540 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Keywords|