https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48559
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'm inclined to close this as WONTFIX.
The new C++17 algorithms use modern C++ and are standardised. Rather than
maintain our non-standard extension, I'd prefer to deprecate our parallel mode
and tell peop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48559
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-17
23:17:00 UTC ---
Actually, the parallel-mode std::partition seems already ok, in any case I just
enabled its moveable.cc to actually run in parallel-mode.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48559
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-13
02:02:32 UTC ---
Johannes, all -
if everything goes well, in a couple of days we'll have a very good
std::is_constructible in, contributed by Daniel, thus, it will be trivial,
std::is_copy_constructi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48559
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-12
19:20:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> On the other hand, we sometimes need references to elements of the
> random-access input sequence(s). We could always use an iterator, but that
> might be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48559
sing...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48559
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||singler at kit dot edu
--- Comment #1 fro
