https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47320
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
N.B. I've just reverted this fix as part of
r12-4268-gfec283b63d7f24f4c37792dd07ab1055186ba88f
The numeric limits specialization is defined unconditionally, so is correct
whether or not _GLIBCXX_USE_WCHAR_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47320
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47320
--- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-16 20:55:34 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Jan 16 20:55:30 2011
New Revision: 168873
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168873
Log:
2011-01-16 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47320
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
