[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

2011-02-16 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

2010-10-29 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 Benjamin Kosnik changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

2010-10-29 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-29 11:09:25 UTC --- So this is part of http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3164.html

[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

2010-10-28 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-28 11:11:09 UTC --- I haven't followed it, but it wouldn't surprise me if a few issues were closed as NAD Editorial without actually being fixed

[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

2010-10-28 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

2010-10-28 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-28 09:59:43 UTC --- Thanks Jon, much better implementing it ;)

[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

2010-10-28 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-10-28 09:54:24 UTC --- http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#879

[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

2010-10-28 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-28 09:50:37 UTC --- Note, we have a much more general issue with atomic<_Tp*> vs atomic_address: everywhere we are assuming _Tp is not cv-qualified and this is not going to work with atomic_address, which

[Bug libstdc++/46207] std::atomic::store(...) fails to compile

2010-10-28 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46207 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|