--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 03:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=20881)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20881&action=view)
patch
This patch fixes it for me. I'm not entirely sure this is a proper use of
forward, but it seems appropriat
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-06-10 01:07
---
The constructor at issue is trivially conforming to the most recent specs
(n3092) (*), thus, in my opinion, either this is a compiler issue, or a defect
in c++0x or a feature in c++0x itself, can't be a library
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 00:48 ---
What I mean is that the C++ front-end is correct to reject the code that
libstdc++ provides to it. If there is a bug it is a problem with libstdc++ (or
maybe even the in flux C++0x STL :) ).
--
http://gcc.gnu.o
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-10 00:43 ---
I think this is because C++0x introduces rvalue references and those cannot
bind to lvalues.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
