http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43451
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-07 22:15
---
That would be just great!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43451
--- Comment #4 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 21:47 ---
sorry p, i have these changes on a branch as part of the constexpr work. will
finish up this week.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43451
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-07 13:28
---
By the way the same problem exists for the atomic partial specialization.
In general, audit for volatile.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43451
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-03-19 22:25
---
Benjamin, I'm adding you in CC, I don't know which plans do we have wrt to this
issue for 4.5.0...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-03-19 22:15
---
Yes. To be clear, Bugzilla isn't the proper tool for this kind of issue: it is
for *bug* tracking - not for managing the development of new projects - and the
whole C++0x is indeed a new project, and an experim
