[Bug libstdc++/42622] [C++0x] Improve std::ratio_less to not overflow

2011-03-02 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42622 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-02 15:06:29 UTC --- Applied, thanks.

[Bug libstdc++/42622] [C++0x] Improve std::ratio_less to not overflow

2011-03-02 Thread marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42622 --- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse 2011-03-02 14:58:06 UTC --- Created attachment 23514 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23514 4 lines of comments... It might be better to write a single paragraph explaining the algo instead of a

[Bug libstdc++/42622] [C++0x] Improve std::ratio_less to not overflow

2011-02-28 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42622 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/42622] [C++0x] Improve std::ratio_less to not overflow

2011-02-28 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42622 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-28 16:46:28 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Feb 28 16:46:23 2011 New Revision: 170567 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170567 Log: 2011-02-28 Paolo Carlini * tests

[Bug libstdc++/42622] [C++0x] Improve std::ratio_less to not overflow

2011-02-28 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42622 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-02-28 14:51:08 UTC --- Well, I can check, but if you sent already the form, it should be matter of 1-2 weeks max for you to get back via email the pdf of your assignment. When did you send the form signed?

[Bug libstdc++/42622] [C++0x] Improve std::ratio_less to not overflow

2011-02-28 Thread marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42622 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse 2011-02-28 14:45:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I think the patch is small enough > to go in at your name without Copyright Assignment. I believe I am supposed to have the paperwork in order now. Would you

[Bug libstdc++/42622] [C++0x] Improve std::ratio_less to not overflow

2011-02-28 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42622 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-02-28 14:32:09 UTC --- Testing at my end went well. I guess I'm going to apply the patch for 4.6.0, together with an handful of additional tests. I think the patch is small enough to go in at your name witho

[Bug libstdc++/42622] [C++0x] Improve std::ratio_less to not overflow

2011-02-28 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42622 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-02-28 11:15:44 UTC --- Thanks Marc, let me have a closer look to the code and some testing.

[Bug libstdc++/42622] [C++0x] Improve std::ratio_less to not overflow

2011-02-27 Thread marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42622 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2011-02-28 07:49:42 UTC --- Created attachment 23487 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23487 proposed fix Not thoroughly tested, but it seems to pass comp1.cc and comp2.cc.

[Bug libstdc++/42622] [C++0x] Improve std::ratio_less to not overflow

2010-01-09 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
-- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last re