[Bug libstdc++/41510] [C++0x] std::complex vs. initialization lists

2010-05-22 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-22 20:21 --- Hi Gaby: actually, I don't think it does, see the error messages above, which are still up to date, as far as I can see. I will double check, anyway, and if I notice something new I'll let you know asap. Thanks

[Bug libstdc++/41510] [C++0x] std::complex vs. initialization lists

2010-05-22 Thread gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu
--- Comment #3 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2010-05-22 15:32 --- Subject: Re: [C++0x] std::complex vs. initialization lists "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" writes: | Jason, can you have a look to the errors due to the ambiguous overloading | pointed out by Benjamin? Happen f

[Bug libstdc++/41510] [C++0x] std::complex vs. initialization lists

2010-05-22 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-22 08:07 --- Jason, can you have a look to the errors due to the ambiguous overloading pointed out by Benjamin? Happen for this type of copy initialization: std::complex z4 = {1.1, 2.2}; where value_type is either float

[Bug libstdc++/41510] C++0x std::complex vs. initialization lists

2009-09-29 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-30 01:48 --- Created an attachment (id=18667) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18667&action=view) c++0x test for std::complex -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41510