--- Comment #6 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-03-09 15:20
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Well, the as-if rule allows (x.c < ((y.c)) too of course.
bah - it would allow it if I could type the right number of closing
parentheses!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #5 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-03-09 15:19
---
Well, the as-if rule allows (x.c < ((y.c)) too of course.
I could be wrong and the compiler should parse it ok, I haven't thought about
it very hard.
The same problem occurs here, although it's only in a
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-03-09 15:08
---
Before considering touching the library, I want evidence that at least another
widespread implementation has that operator< somehow different than the obvious
way. Besides, the issue affects too, of course, an
--- Comment #3 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-03-09 14:25
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> FWIW, if I use v3 together with the Intel C++ compiler, it builds...
>
That's interesting, Comeau's online compiler gives a very similar error to gcc
4.3.2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-03-09 14:02
---
FWIW, if I use v3 together with the Intel C++ compiler, it builds...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39407
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-03-09 14:00
---
disgusting ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39407
