--- Comment #20 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-04 15:43
---
Fixed again.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 15:41 ---
Subject: Bug 36616
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jul 4 15:40:52 2008
New Revision: 137468
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137468
Log:
2008-07-04 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libst
--- Comment #18 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 15:41 ---
Subject: Bug 36616
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jul 4 15:40:38 2008
New Revision: 137467
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137467
Log:
2008-07-04 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libst
--- Comment #17 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-06-28 18:11
---
Yes HJ, this is well known. The changes you posted are necessary for the
glibc2.8 used in openSUSE 11, per this report.
By the way, technically, this PR should not be reopened, instead a different
one opened,
--- Comment #16 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-06-28 14:21
---
I never saw those failures on Fedora 9. 22_locale/time_put/put/char/4.cc
change is
@@ -48,12 +49,20 @@ void test04()
const time_put& tim_put = use_facet >(oss.getloc());
iterator_type os_it04 = tim_put.put(
--- Comment #15 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-06-28 14:16
---
I got the same failure on Fedora 9 with glibc-2.8-3. All failures look
like:
22_locale/time_put/put/char/4.cc:53: void test04(): Assertion `result4 ==
"dim."' failed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
--- Comment #14 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-06-28 10:29 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Hm, these now fail on my x86_64 Fedora 9:
>
> FAIL: 22_locale/time_put/put/char/4.cc execution test
This is what is passed to VERIFY for 4.cc in my case [GLIBC major.minor = 2.8]:
result4 di
--- Comment #13 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-06-28 09:07
---
Uros, your help is appreciated, thanks. Note that, unfortunately, seems
unlikely that 31413 is related: here we are talking about european locale, if I
remember correctly. It looks like indeed for some reason
--- Comment #12 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-06-28 06:17 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Hm, these now fail on my x86_64 Fedora 9:
>
> FAIL: 22_locale/time_put/put/char/4.cc execution test
> FAIL: 22_locale/time_put/put/char/wrapped_env.cc execution test
> FAIL: 22_locale/time_put
--- Comment #11 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-06-24 21:29
---
Frankly, I find that extremely hard to believe, did you fully update? Because
of course I tested both on a glibc2.8 machine (openSUSE 11) and a glibc2.6.1
machine. Please post the relevant lines in libstdc++.l
--- Comment #10 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-06-24 20:42 ---
Hm, these now fail on my x86_64 Fedora 9:
FAIL: 22_locale/time_put/put/char/4.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_put/put/char/wrapped_env.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/time_put/put/char/wrapped_locale.cc executio
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-06-24 17:18
---
Yes.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36616
--- Comment #8 from Markus dot Elfring at web dot de 2008-06-24 17:13
---
Thanks.
Were only the test cases affected?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36616
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-06-24 16:34
---
Fixed for mainline and 4.3.2.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-24 16:32 ---
Subject: Bug 36616
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jun 24 16:31:22 2008
New Revision: 137074
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137074
Log:
2008-06-24 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstd
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-24 16:31 ---
Subject: Bug 36616
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jun 24 16:31:06 2008
New Revision: 137073
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137073
Log:
2008-06-24 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstd
--- Comment #4 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-06-24 15:19 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Yes, I suppose Fedora also uses glibc2.8?
Yes.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36616
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-06-24 13:07
---
Yes, I suppose Fedora also uses glibc2.8?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36616
--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-06-24 12:59 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is essentially because openSUSE 11.0 uses glibc2.8 (at variance with
> 10.3,
> for example). Likely, there are some small changes in the localedata, not
> worrisome, but let's look a bit in
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-06-24 12:34
---
This is essentially because openSUSE 11.0 uses glibc2.8 (at variance with 10.3,
for example). Likely, there are some small changes in the localedata, not
worrisome, but let's look a bit into it.
--
paolo do
20 matches
Mail list logo
