--- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-01-01 16:46 ---
The issue certainly specific to this PR is fixed, I'm closing it as duplicate
of 34095, just in case there is still something special to it or the testcase
is easier to deal with to the people working on 34095.
*** This bu
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-01 16:43 ---
Subject: Bug 34636
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jan 1 16:42:34 2008
New Revision: 131245
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131245
Log:
2008-01-01 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstd
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-01-01 15:30 ---
The issue for short vectors seems rather trivial,
__parallel::lexicographical_compare_switch not careful with empty ranges.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34636
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-01-01 15:13 ---
Apparently it's a duplicate of 34095 only for a sufficiently big outer vector.
When the outer vector is small, 34095 doesn't fail and this one still does,
differently (not in ~vector but in __gnu_parallel::less)
--
pcar
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-01-01 13:29 ---
Both testcases fail for me too, with a segfault, on x86_64-linux.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34636
--- Comment #2 from chris at bubblescope dot net 2008-01-01 13:08 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Is this related to libstdc++/34095?
>
Good question, could be. That code also fails to run for me. Unfortunately I
don't really have any good idea how to go about debugging this, as I know
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-01-01 13:01 ---
Is this related to libstdc++/34095?
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
