--- Comment #8 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-01-01 19:08 ---
Fixed.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-01 19:06 ---
Subject: Bug 34095
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jan 1 19:05:41 2008
New Revision: 131247
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131247
Log:
2008-01-01 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstd
--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-01-01 18:10 ---
Seems just a trivial thing: a delete[] in place of ::operator delete
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-01-01 16:46 ---
*** Bug 34636 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-12-13 22:54 ---
By the way, the size of the vector affects whether the testcase fails or
not. Apparently the algorithms decide that if the vector is too small
then it's not worth subdividing the work. On my 2-processor machine, 20,000
i
--- Comment #3 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-12-12 22:44 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Let's just close it if you can't reproduce now. I'll just try to run
> everything
> again some time from now and if I have the same problem again I'll re-open.
Hm, so I got around to check th
--- Comment #2 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-12-11 20:55 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hey Wolfgang, I cannot reproduce this:
>
> g++ -g -O2 -march=native -fopenmp -D_GLIBCXX_PARALLEL 34059.cc
>
> Seems to run fine for me. I'm using
>
>
> g++ (GCC) 4.3.0 20071209 (experiment
--- Comment #1 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-11 19:15 ---
Hey Wolfgang, I cannot reproduce this:
g++ -g -O2 -march=native -fopenmp -D_GLIBCXX_PARALLEL 34059.cc
Seems to run fine for me. I'm using
g++ (GCC) 4.3.0 20071209 (experimental)
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.o
