--- Comment #15 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-30 13:05 ---
Subject: Bug 33815
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Oct 30 13:05:26 2007
New Revision: 129769
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129769
Log:
2007-10-19 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libst
--- Comment #14 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-21 11:33 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Sure thing.
Excellent.
> I will need a little bit of time to familiarize myself with the current code.
> Also, I will need a little bit of help in finding my way around. E.g., where
> do
> th
--- Comment #13 from jkherciueh at gmx dot net 2007-10-21 09:49 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> In order to have a fully conforming implementation, we need something which
> works for *any* source range and *any* target range. Are you willing to
> work on that? Would be mainline-only of
--- Comment #12 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-20 11:27 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> I just tested this. It does a much better job at obfuscating the bias, which
> is
> still there (after all you are rescaling linearly). If you rescale a domain of
> size 16 to a range of size
--- Comment #11 from jkherciueh at gmx dot net 2007-10-20 11:07 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Actually, would be:
>
> Index: random
> ===
> --- random (revision 129456)
> +++ random (working copy)
> @@ -1607,7 +1
--- Comment #10 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-20 10:05 ---
Fixed for 4.2.3.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-20 10:03 ---
Subject: Bug 33815
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Oct 20 10:03:10 2007
New Revision: 129508
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129508
Log:
2007-10-20 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* include
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-20 10:02 ---
Subject: Bug 33815
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Oct 20 10:02:34 2007
New Revision: 129507
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129507
Log:
2007-10-20 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* include
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-19 17:36 ---
Subject: Bug 33815
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 19 17:36:03 2007
New Revision: 129493
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129493
Log:
2007-10-19 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstd
--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-19 11:26 ---
Actually, would be:
Index: random
===
--- random (revision 129456)
+++ random (working copy)
@@ -1607,7 +1607,8 @@
{
typedef type
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-19 10:49 ---
To wit, this kind of change, you can certainly apply it to the 4.2.1 headers
as-is:
Index: random
===
--- random (revision 129456)
+++ random (worki
--- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-19 10:46 ---
I'm going to commit to mainline a stop-gap solution. If you could confirm, as I
believe, that it's at least an improvement, we can have it in 4_2-branch too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33815
--- Comment #3 from jkherciueh at gmx dot net 2007-10-19 10:13 ---
> Actually, the problem happens only for some specific values of the range, like
> eng.max() / 5.5, dividing by 2 or 10 is ok. Indeed, seems a binary arithmetic
> problem.
I conjecture that the problem happens if and onl
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pcarlini at suse dot de
|dot org |
--- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-19 09:40 ---
Actually, the problem happens only for some specific values of the range, like
eng.max() / 5.5, dividing by 2 or 10 is ok. Indeed, seems a binary arithmetic
problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33815
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-19 09:37 ---
Note that our implementation has nothing to do with the Boost one. The problem
happens when the range is big. Anyway, we know our implementation is naive in
this case, we'll look into it.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de chan
16 matches
Mail list logo
