--- Comment #6 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2007-09-04 08:43
---
OK, thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33293
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-04 08:41 ---
The patch itself is trivial but in our experience changing the inlining
patterns can have far reaching and unpredictable fall-outs. Thus, better not
touching the release branches, sorry.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
--- Comment #4 from simon dot marshall at misys dot com 2007-09-04 08:01
---
Many thanks for the quick response. Any chance it could make it into 4.2.2?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33293
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-03 17:50 ---
Fixed for 4.3.0.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-03 17:48 ---
Subject: Bug 33293
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Sep 3 17:48:31 2007
New Revision: 128053
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128053
Log:
2007-09-03 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstd
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-03 17:20 ---
Note, in GCC any -Ox, x > 3 is identical to -O3.
Anyway, I think we can safely add inline to std::accumulate and
std::inner_product.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed
