--- Comment #19 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-20 19:25 ---
Fixed for 4.4.0
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSI
--- Comment #18 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-01-20
15:36 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: abi_check hppa
> The float versions were added in r143457
The abi check problem is fixed, and the hpux test results on
hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 are again ok.
Dave
--- Comment #17 from bkoz at redhat dot com 2009-01-20 05:51 ---
The float versions were added in r143457
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-01/msg00470.html
hpux 11 looks fine, but I don't see 10.x results.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
--- Comment #16 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-01-17
16:02 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: abi_check hppa
> I think we also need float stubs. I saw some problems with
> floorf in the testsuite in my last build.
There are four testsuite fails due to floorf being missing. He
--- Comment #15 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-01-16
20:51 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: abi_check hppa
> add in stubs.c for long double only
I think we also need float stubs. I saw some problems with
floorf in the testsuite in my last build.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.
--- Comment #14 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 02:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=17112)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17112&action=view)
add in stubs.c for long double only
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
--- Comment #13 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 02:26 ---
Ouch. I see this also on arm-elf crosses, whoops.
Here's a patch that I'm currently testing on cross. If it fixes it, then I'll
check it in and then please try on hpux.
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #12 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-01-16
00:24 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: abi_check
> --- Comment #9 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 10:02 ---
> Created an attachment (id=17084)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17084&ac
--- Comment #11 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-15 20:02 ---
Subject: Bug 32666
Author: bkoz
Date: Thu Jan 15 20:02:11 2009
New Revision: 143406
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143406
Log:
2009-01-15 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/32666
--- Comment #10 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-15 18:38 ---
checked the patch with trunk 20090115:
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for
excess errors)
=== libstdc++ S
--- Comment #9 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 10:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=17084)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17084&action=view)
shiny
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #8 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 08:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=17083)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17083&action=view)
check abi fails
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
--- Comment #7 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-13 08:41 ---
From:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg00197.html
Looking at the __signbitl issue first. HPPA is the only platform that wants to
export this. Let's try to figure out why.
I see this in include/c_global/cma
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-09-30
21:51 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: abi_check
> --- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-18 21:54 ---
> These all appear to be fails from missing C99 math functionality: tanl, etc.
>
> So, maybe so
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-09-18
22:24 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: abi_check
> So, maybe something with libmath config, config for C99 functions?
Think so, I see asinf isn't found, yet it's there. I'm going
to remove "-j 2" from my make script. That
--- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-18 21:54 ---
These all appear to be fails from missing C99 math functionality: tanl, etc.
So, maybe something with libmath config, config for C99 functions?
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666
--- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-07-07
15:55 ---
Subject: Re: New: FAIL: abi_check
> I've seen this with 4.2.1 and 4.3.0.
Attached is the output log (probably somewhat out of order).
Dave
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot c
17 matches
Mail list logo
