--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-14 20:44
---
Yes, I agree, in the light of the resolution of DR456, let's keep open 33935
instead, and clarify in it that non-GNU targets have yet to provide a mechanism
similar to the one used in recent glibcs.
--
htt
--- Comment #5 from marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org 2010-01-14 20:35
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> It seems to me extremely unlikely that an implementation decides to provide
> the
> full-const version when called by a c++ compiler and nothing else, because C++
> does *not* add
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-14 17:23
---
It seems to me extremely unlikely that an implementation decides to provide the
full-const version when called by a c++ compiler and nothing else, because C++
does *not* add an overload, *replaces both*. Thus i
--- Comment #3 from marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org 2009-01-30 20:38
---
Hello,
looking at the two last comments, I think we are speaking of slightly different
things, although they are related. I was asking for some const_cast of the
return value, in case the const version of wc
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-01-30 12:08
---
*** Bug 33935 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last re
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-30 11:48 ---
For very recent glibc this has been fixed with
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143773
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30928
