--- Comment #15 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-10-03 22:56
---
*** Bug 36893 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #12 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 13:50 ---
Subject: Bug 30085
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 30 13:48:55 2008
New Revision: 140786
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140786
Log:
2008-09-30 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libst
--- Comment #14 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-30 13:52
---
Fixed.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #13 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 13:50 ---
Subject: Bug 30085
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 30 13:49:15 2008
New Revision: 140787
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140787
Log:
2008-09-30 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libst
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org|
AssignedTo|bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org |paolo dot carli
--- Comment #11 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-29 17:24
---
Ok, no problem, thanks for your quick feedback. I'll see what I can do...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30085
--- Comment #10 from bkoz at redhat dot com 2008-09-29 17:17 ---
Sorry P, I have not paid attention to this. I am not likely to work on it this
week, so if you want to work on it feel free.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30085
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-29 14:36
---
Benjamin, are you actively taking care of this issue?
Otherwise, I can have a look, really we should have the unordered containers
working fine in debug-mode too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
--- Comment #8 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-05 23:53
---
I think this is a major loss of function, we want to fix this before 4.4.0.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-19 00:26
---
Benjamin, the problem is that _Safe_association doesn't inherit from
_Safe_sequence: everything in _Safe_association having to do with safe iterator
construction (eg., simply in begin()) breaks because the _Saf
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-05-29 10:29
---
Benjamin, can you double check this work? In debug mode the citerators
testcases, which predate it, fail for me...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-18 16:04 ---
Done.
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-18 15:23 ---
Subject: Bug 30085
Author: bkoz
Date: Thu Oct 18 15:22:58 2007
New Revision: 129442
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129442
Log:
2007-10-18 Benjamin Kosnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* include
--- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-12 00:11 ---
Mine
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gc
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-27 00:06 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-12-07 10:07 ---
*Assuming* we keep delivering the legacy hash_* containers, probably we should
also keep the corresponding debug mode version. Indeed, if we start delivering
the unordered containers in namespace std we should also deliver
16 matches
Mail list logo
